Follow this blog with bloglovin

Follow kimcrawley.com- Bright Ideas

Thursday, September 30, 2010

The Web and Your Brain!









 As a web designer, I've got to make sure that the web pages that I build are intuitive for the user.  That means that site navigation should be easily visible and accessible, the organization of my site (the sequence that my pages are linked together in) should be logical, and that there is NO page of my site that takes more than two clicks from my index page to get to.  

 Well, a lot of why that's important is due to how our brains work.  And, apparently, the Web, and the Internet overall, is reorganizing our brains!  Information is quicker than ever to access.  What's the weather forecast for Grimsby, Ontario?  How about Toronto, I'm going there tomorrow... Do FUNImation, Sentai Filmworks, or Bandai have any new anime licenses?  Did Stephen Harper say anything infuriating today?  Do I have any new Twitter followers? (Actually, I have many new followers everyday, check it out at twitter.com/kim_crawley!)  All of these questions can be reached with a few clicks.  Google, Wikipedia, RSS feeds (subscribe to mine at feeds.feedburner.com/kimcrawleycom-BrightIdeas) and social media are helping us access new information with great speed.  Therefore, people are developing shorter attention spans.  Television was nothing, you ain't seen nothin' yet!

 I've been using PCs daily since about 1992 (when I was eight years old!), and I've been on the Internet since 1994.  

 Last week, I was helping a family member post ads on kijiji.ca.  He does his everyday work on his computer.  He checks his e-mail and surfs the web regularly.  It surprised me that he needed my help.  But I can post a Kijiji ad in about thirty seconds, complete with photos and perfect spelling.  He can figure out how to do it himself, but it would take him such a loooong time.  And I've got to hold his hand while he uses Twitter.  "What do I do, Kim?"  "Type your message in 140 characters or less, then click 'tweet'!"  He can use the Internet for his purposes and enjoyment, but he seems slow and lacking confidence when he encounters something new.  I see something new, and within minutes, I'm using it as if I've always used it.

 He is a very bright man, but I grew up with computers and he didn't.  Of course, the brain is a lot more plastic when one is younger.

 But, according to a UCLA study (gosh, I hate linking to Fox News), there is hope for rewiring your brain with Internet use, even if you're older or new to the technology:

"We found that for older people with minimal experience, performing Internet searches for even a relatively short period of time can change brain activity patterns and enhance function," Dr. Gary Small, study author and professor of psychiatry at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, said in a statement.
 he UCLA team worked with 24 neurologically normal volunteers between the ages of 55 and 78. Prior to the study, half the participants used the Internet daily, while the other half had very little experience. Age, educational level and gender were similar between the two groups.
 The participants performed Web searches while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans, which recorded the subtle brain-circuitry changes experienced during this activity. This type of scan tracks brain activity by measuring the level of blood flow in the brain during cognitive tasks. While the study involves a small number of people and more research on this topic is needed, small study sizes are typical of fMRI-based research.


 After the initial brain scan, subjects went home and conducted Internet searches for one hour a day for a total of seven days over a two-week period. These practice searches involved using the web to answer questions about various topics by exploring different websites and reading information. Participants then received a second brain scan using the same Internet simulation task, but with different topics.


 The first scan of participants with little Internet experience showed brain activity in the regions controlling language, reading, memory and visual abilities. The second brain scan of these participants, conducted after the home practice searches, demonstrated activation of these same regions, but there was also activity in the middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus – areas of the brain known to be important in working memory and decision-making.


 Thus, after Internet training at home, participants with minimal online experience displayed brain activation patterns very similar to those seen in the group of savvy Internet users.


 Why don't I see that happening in real life?  Either they need to use greater numbers of test subjects, or I'm being too hard on my dear old family member.


 But now there's scientific data to suggest that the Internet is getting into our BRAINS!  Not just via computers, but also through smartphones, tablets, and any other device that can use the Internet.


 We've got to design our websites with user's brains in mind, but perhaps user's brains are being designed with our websites in mind, too.  That's strange, exciting, and creepy! 


kimcrawley.com



twitter.com/kim_crawley

Getting ready for HTML5- New tags, part three








 This is my final post about the new tags in HTML5.  There are still more Project HTML5 posts to come, but this concludes the 'new tags' series.


 Here are all of my previous Project HTML5 posts if you haven't read them already:






 So obviously, I haven't described all of the new features of HTML5, but I'm mentioning the new tags I find the most exciting.  You can look forward to a post coming up about the tags in HTML4 that have been dropped in 5, which is very useful if you're trying to convert your pages to the new HTML5 standard.  I'm definitely going to have to get out of my ugly habit of using the <center> tag, that's for sure!


 Okay, the last new HTML5 tags I believe that are worth mentioning-


 The new <mark> tag is like applying a highlighter to some of your prose text.  For reference purposes, and possibly to get the reader's attention, you want those words to stand out.  For example:


 <p>My name is Kim Crawley, and I'm a freelance web designer.  I can make a <mark style="background-color:#EC47FF;">beautiful, professional looking, custom website</mark> for you or your small business.</p>


I'm assuming that CSS3 will have some options for stylizing the way you want <mark> to display.


I've already gone into detail about the new <video> and <audio> tags, so I must describe the new <source> tag, too.   Most web designers know that visitors don't always have the right codecs available for their browser to use some types of audio or video files.  Some people might not even have codecs for popular media formats available in their browser.  Someone might have codecs for .wma files, but not for .mp3s, for instance.  If you are wise when integrating different media in your web design, you may have different file format versions of the same content.  You can make use of that sort of preparation this way:


Here's some proof that my mother is a horrible singer:<br><br>
<audio height="30" width="150" align="right" autoplay><source src="http://www.kimcrawley.com/mymothershorriblesinger.wma" type="audio/x-ms-wma"><source src="http://www.kimcrawley.com/mymotherisahorriblesinger.mp3" type="audio/mpeg">Your browser doesn't support HTML5.</audio>


 So, the <source> tag doesn't need a closing tag, but it must be between <audio> and </audio> or <video> and </video>.  As I mentioned in previous posts, any text between <audio> and </audio> or <video> and </video> will display in browsers that don't support the tag, but won't display in browsers that do.


 And the very last new HTML5 tag that I'll mention is the <nav> tag.  If your webpage's navigational links are rendered as text or images as opposed to JavaScript or Flash, this is a useful new tag to enclose your navigational links in.  Your browser may find this useful.  I'm thinking it may allow be useful with web bots, because it will know, for instance, not to display that data in your Google listing.


 So, the new <nav> tag may be used like this:


<nav><a href="http://www.kimcrawley.com/links.html">Links</a>|<a href="http://www.kimcrawley.com/portfolio.html">Portfolio</a>|<a href="http://www.kimcrawley.com/aboutme.html">About Me</a></nav>


 There are no attributes for the <nav> tag, but a closing </nav> tag must be used.


 Next in my Project HTML5 series, I'll mention some of the tags from earlier versions of HTML (and possibly some from XHTML) that have been dropped.


kimcrawley.com


twitter.com/kim_crawley










Wednesday, September 29, 2010

I am OBSESSED with these songs, Al Jarreau edition



  Ah, my last post for today.  I did a previous post featuring a Youtube video of a Bob James song that I LOVE, but I've got to be one of the biggest Al Jarreau fans in the world.


 Today's a great day for lots of awesome Al Jarreau music!  Enjoy!










































kimcrawley.com



twitter.com/kim_crawley

A 'Shout-Out' for Feminists for Choice


 Hey, I just want to give a 'shout-out' to Feminists For Choice.  I discovered, via Twitter yesterday, that they're looking for a logo designer.  See http://feministsforchoice.com/looking-for-pro-choice-graphic-designer.htm.  As I consider myself a feminist, I'm strongly pro-choice, and I'm good at graphic design, I thought I would give it a shot.  Below is the logo I designed and a sample 'web ad' for them:




 Serena Freewomyn, Feminists for Choice's founder, sent me a reply saying that she is considering me for the job.  I previously e-mailed her those samples.

 Although I'm a web designer, I love designing logos, and other graphics for professional purposes, too.  Below is the logo I designed for Buchalter Consulting, an investor relations firm I do all the webmastering, web design and social media for:



 I would love it if Serena would choose me.  I strongly support her organization, and it would be good promotion for my web design business, even though I would be creating a logo and ads for them, not doing web design.  

 Although I don't offer prices for logo and ad design on my website, people may gladly propose projects like that to me, possibly via e-mail, and I would be very inexpensive.

 If Serena and Feminists For Choice choose me, I would probably redo the ad by adding a graphic of a female, or a group of females, with their arms crossed, the body language suggesting 'MY body is MINE'.  The reason why I didn't simply do a Google image search for a photo is because I don't want a woman or womyn to come back to me saying 'hey, I don't permit this!'  But I would be okay with my photo being in the ad, and with having the photos of other adult females involved if they consent.

 Why don't you visit feminstsforchoice.com?









kimcrawley.com


twitter.com/kim_crawley

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

The Great Glasses Controversy


 Above is an image of the Great Glasses location in Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada.

  To visitors all over the world, and to those in Ontario who aren't aware of the issue, Great Glasses is an Ontario optical chain that is in serious legal trouble.
  
   What they provide is a very desirable service to Ontarians without private optical insurance coverage, a free eye test with only having to pay for the glasses or contact lenses a customer wants.  For customers who want glasses, they will usually sell three pairs for around $200 or so altogether.

  As of November 1st, 2004, in Ontario, OHIP stopped providing optical testing coverage for adults aged 20-64.  OHIP is the Ontario government's public health insurance plan.  See http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/ohip/resources/fs_eyecare_110104.pdf for more on the optical care/OHIP issue.  

  My opinion of the matter is I'm outraged that OHIP no longer pays for optical testing for most Ontario adults.  But then, I'm also outraged that OHIP doesn't cover medically necessary dental care, either.  And untreated dental infections can actually become deadly.  OHIP covers all kinds of treatment for patients with non-lethal medical conditions.

  Anyway, in the wake of the coverage cuts made by OHIP in late 2004, Great Glasses started to thrive.  There are at least a couple of dozen locations across the province, with a few in Hamilton.  But ever since 2003, Great Glasses has faced legal trouble, too.  In order to provide free eye exams, Great Glasses can't hire optometrists.  Store clerks with just a little bit of store training use eye testing equipment to determine a customer's prescription.  But a non-optometrist with just a little bit of training about how to use eye testing equipment can determine a customer's correct prescription.  See this excerpt from Sam Blitz at Cracked.com about professions that may be disappearing:

 Those of you with glasses or contacts, think about the last time you went to the optometrist. What exactly did he or she actually do? They have a bunch of machines where an assistant checks you for cataracts or whatever, then the actual eye doctor has you look into a machine and you tell him whether or not you can see with various lenses. Then he writes down a number and they either feed it into a machine that spits out some lenses, or a lady at the counter grabs some contacts off the shelf. We're not looking to insult the eye doctors of the world but come on. These aren't exactly House-style medical mysteries here.

It doesn't take a million-dollar robot to do the job, either. Consider the smart phone app called NETRA, which stands for Near-Eye Tool for Refractive Assessment. It aims to replace your local optometrist with a plastic lens phone attachment. The device is quite similar to the normal optometrist tool, except that it lets the user adjust the focus of the image on his own without the need of a Ph.D.-laden middleman.


Read more: 
http://www.cracked.com/article_18759_6-iconic-jobs-that-are-going-away-forever_p2.html#ixzz10qlAGUQC

 ______________________________


 I've read comments on articles on the Hamilton Spectator (TheSpec.com) saying that maybe non-medical professionals (or robots!) may be able to determine someone's glasses or contact lens prescription, but only a physician like an optometrist can diagnose eye diseases, which an optometrist may spot during an eye exam.   I have a father who's had cataract surgery in both eyes, a mother with glaucoma, and a legally blind paternal grandmother with macular degeneration, so I see the point.  But why don't we have store clerks or robots give glasses/contact lens prescriptions, and then have people visit a real optometrist once every few years to test for eye diseases?  Having store clerks make visual correction prescriptions would cut out a lot of an optometrists' workload, so that they can focus on glaucoma, etc.


  Ah, but then, we would need fewer optometrists.  I can certainly understand the College of Optometrists and College of Opticians pursuing legal action against Great Glasses founder Bruce Bergez.  See (http://www.thespec.com/news/local/article/251006--great-glasses-bergez-wife-to-be-sentenced-oct-1)  And I'm usually a supporter of worker's rights and labour unions.  For instance, I've permanently boycotted Walmart.  


  Then, why doesn't the Ontario government/OHIP restore eye exam funding for ALL Ontarians?  And then cover all necessary (non-cosmetic) dental care for ALL Ontarians?  The Ontario government could afford it if the federal government would give more money to Ontario.  And the federal government would have more money for the Ontario government if: 


  • We cut funding to all three branches of the Canadian military, so that we have enough forces to protect Canada and her allies from International threats, but not so many troops and equipment to fight wars Canada shouldn't be involved in, such as Afghanistan.  I say this as a sister of a Canadian air force member who is currently stationed in Kabul, Afghanistan, Captain Winston Crawley.  We can lay off half of our troops, cancel the over BILLION dollar order of fighter jets, and sell half of the military equipment currently in possession.  I have a lot of respect for our brave men and women in the armed forces, and the ones who are made to return to civilian life should get all the financial help from the government needed for college, university, retraining, and finding civilian applications for the special skills the former soldiers may have.  The government must protect their military pensions, and give all the financial help needed to find a decent paying civilian career.  But even with the billions of dollars that may be needed, we would quickly save the federal government billions of dollars by having smaller armed forces only fighting when necessary to protect Canada and her allies.
  • Marijuana was made legally available to Canadian adults (maybe take a cue from tobacco and alcohol laws and make the legal age 19), and taxed like tobacco.  Countless billions of dollars would be saved from freeing cops from pursuing people who are simply enjoying smoking weed, and billions saved from the criminal courts no longer dealing with marijuana possession/trafficking issues.  Marijuana taxes would fill the federal coffers with additonal billions.
  • These two things will only be made possible when we no longer have a 'Dubya' light like Stephen Harper as prime minister.  As an NDP supporter, I say we should change our election system from FPTP (first past the post) to proportional representation, and the Liberal party should split up.  The farther right Liberals could make the Conservatives a more moderate party and the farther left Liberals could join the NDP.  I have no problems with naming that new party the Liberal Party.  The fact that 38% or so of voting Canadians chose their Conservative MP candidate should not burden the rest of us with the farthest right wing federal government Canada has ever had.  And contrary to what the conservative media says about us wacky lefties, Harper's Conservatives have spent a lot more money than any other federal government previously, even when adjusted for inflation.


 Ah!  That's my political rant for today.  Anyway, for disclosure, I must say that I'm a customer of Great Glasses, I'm currently wearing a pair I bought from their now closed Ikea Plaza Burlington location last spring.


  Anyway, amidst all of their legal troubles (see  http://www.thespec.com/news/local/article/251006--great-glasses-bergez-wife-to-be-sentenced-oct-1 and http://www.thespec.com/news/local/article/250730--great-glasses-sentencing-put-off-till-oct-1), I'm surprised they're still in business.  I wonder for how much longer?















kimcrawley.com



twitter.com/kim_crawley

Monday, September 27, 2010

Getting ready for HTML5- Browser support





 I return to my Project HTML5 series, immediately after my most recent HTML5 post.


 Here's an index of previous posts in this series, if you've missed any:

















 Now for an exciting post about which browsers support HTML5, and how well, so far.  I found a couple of handy resources.  Go ahead and try html5test.com.  Whichever browser you're using, it will give you a detailed, graded report as to how well your browser supports HTML5.  The screenshot below shows MY result when I tried the site about an hour ago.  For the curious, my OS is Windows XP (don't laugh), and the browser I was using (and the browser I use most often) is Google Chrome 6.0.472.63 beta, the most recent version of Chrome as of this writing.





















 So, my favourite browser does fairly well with HTML5.  But with 217 out of 300, there's some room for improvement.  Hopefully, by Chrome 7, all of HTML5 and CSS3 will be supported, with all related attributes for tags.  With my most recent version of Chrome 6, most of HTML5 is excellently supported, with the exception of the <device> tag, parsing other than <!DOCTYPE html>, Microdata and WebGL.




 Other than Chrome, Firefox 3.5, Safari 4 and Opera 10 are looking pretty good.  




 The sad story is about Internet Explorer 7 and 8.  There's very little HTML5 support in even IE8.  There's hype about IE 9, which will be released soon, but even IE 9 won't support HTML5 and CSS3 as well as the more recent versions of Google Chrome, Opera, Safari and Mozilla Firefox do.  










 As a web designer, the popularity of Internet Explorer concerns me.  Whenever I see someone use any version of IE at home, what that says to me is that this person either is too lazy or not computer literate enough to Google the name of another browser and go to the pertinent websites to download it.  As most of us know, if someone is running a Microsoft Windows OS, such as XP, Vista or 7, a version of IE will be pre-installed.  

 As a web designer, it bothers me because IE is still used to access the Web 30-40% of the time, so if I don't keep IE in mind in my web design, a significant percentage of my visitors will see a crappy looking website.  If IE, even the hyped new version 9, had excellent support for HTML5, CSS3, or even more recent versions of JavaScript, I could simply optimize my web design the way I do for Chrome, Opera, Safari and Firefox and rest easy.  But when the sites I maintain, kimcrawley.com and buchalterconsulting.ca are optimized for HTML5 in the next few weeks, I'm going to have to have an alternate version of all of the web pages for IE 7, 8, and 9, with a JavaScript redirect applet on both index.html pages.  I'm concerned about how that may affect SEO (search engine optimization), too.




 Even if more home users wise up to how IE sucks, I've still got to consider how, when people are web surfing at work, IE will still be a significant issue.  Most white collar workplaces only allow their employees to use a version of IE.  I think that's because, as a Microsoft product, it's easier to apply NT style user and workgroup rights and permissions to IE and it's features.  Keep in mind, IE isn't necessarily more SECURE than other browsers, just that it may be easier for IT departments to restrict employees' web surfing with IE.  In those environments, even if an employee wanted to download and use another browser, the permissions and rights on their user account won't allow them.

 If you ARE able to download and use another browser and you're using ANY version of IE, including 9, I strongly suggest that you download another browser NOW, for the sake of your overall WWW use.













 There are download links below:

















 kimcrawley.com


 twitter.com/kim_crawley